Friday, 09 October 2026 · World
USD/EUR 0.8923 USD/GBP 0.7565 USD/JPY 158 USD/CNY 6.715 All rates →
RSS
EUROS The World Financial Report
Nº 90 Friday, 09 October 2026 · World Edition
Emerging Markets

Uganda Says Exports to South Sudan Hit US$700 Million

Euros Room · 3h ago · 🇧🇷 Brazil
Uganda Says Exports to South Sudan Hit US$700 Million

Uganda says its exports to South Sudan have reached about US$700 million, up from US$490 million in 2024, as a Kampala business forum sets new targets. The post Uganda Says Exports to South Sudan Hit US$700 Million appeared first on The Rio Times .

Uganda South Sudan trade has climbed to about US$700 million in Ugandan exports, Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in Kampala on Wednesday 7 October. That is up from about US$490 million in 2024. For foreign investors and aid groups, it shows how much a fragile neighbour still leans on Uganda for food, goods and transport.

Ambassador Charles Ssentongo, Director of Protocol Services at the ministry, gave the figures. He was launching the second Uganda, South Sudan Business Forum, which runs at the Mestil Hotel in Kampala from Tuesday 13 to Thursday 15 October.

He stressed that the numbers are not final. The Bank of Uganda, the central bank, is still finalising them. New trade targets will be announced at the end of the forum, he said.

South Sudan became independent in 2011. It has few factories and imports much of what it eats and uses. Uganda sits on its southern border, linked by the main road from Elegu and Nimule to Juba, the capital.

Brigadier General Bonny Bamwiseki, Uganda’s Defence Attaché and head of mission at its embassy in Juba, said trade now spans agriculture, manufacturing, construction materials and services. Education and healthcare are the main services South Sudanese buy from Uganda.

On the wider measure of Uganda South Sudan trade, Ssentongo said two-way flows had averaged between US$700 million and US$800 million a year over the past two years. He credited cooperation between the Uganda Revenue Authority and South Sudan’s revenue body with cutting smuggling and speeding up customs clearance.

The relationship has had shocks. Bamwiseki said Uganda’s embassy stepped in when Ugandan maize was barred from entering South Sudan, and again in a recent dispute over scrap metal.

The upbeat numbers arrived in a tense week. On Monday 5 October, Kalisto Lado, the caretaker Commissioner of Juba County, told foreign traders at Juba’s Kubri Haboba market to focus on wholesale trade and larger investments.

According to Juba-based Eye Radio, he said businesses such as selling charcoal, onions and tomatoes, and motorbike transport, should be left to South Sudanese. Ugandan and Kenyan media reported the remarks as a call to expel foreign traders. Lado has since said a county commissioner has no mandate to expel foreigners.

Rebecca Kadaga, Uganda’s Minister of East African Community Affairs, asked Juba on Ugandan television to respect the bloc’s common market rules. She urged that any measures be applied without discrimination and through legal and diplomatic channels.

Both countries belong to the East African Community, an eight-member regional bloc that is building a customs union and common market. Ssentongo urged traders to respect South Sudan’s “stringent and sovereign regulations” and said Uganda must also remove its own non-tariff barriers.

Akuol Abijok Deng, Chargé d’Affaires at South Sudan’s embassy in Kampala, named high costs, border delays and limited access to finance as the main obstacles. She called for simpler procedures and more transparent rules.

The figures involve no US trade directly. But the corridor matters to Americans in three ways.

First, US investors hold stakes in East African banks, telecom operators and consumer firms that sell into South Sudan. Smoother trade supports their revenue; new barriers would hurt it.

Second, the United States has long been one of the largest donors to South Sudan. Much humanitarian food and fuel moves along the same road from Uganda, so delays at the border raise costs for aid programmes.

Third, stability in South Sudan, which has a long history of conflict, depends partly on affordable imports. The US State Department has for years told Americans not to travel to South Sudan. Trade growth is a modest stabiliser, not a fix.

For context on Uganda’s wider trade picture, see Uganda Trade Deficit Hits Record US$1.14 Billion . Our earlier report on the Juba dispute is Juba Retail Ban Hits Ugandans, but No 7-Day Expulsion .

The US$700 million figure is an estimate. The Bank of Uganda has not yet published final Uganda South Sudan trade numbers, and we could not independently confirm them. The period it covers, a calendar year or the latest twelve months, was not stated.

Reports differed slightly on the 2024 base, at US$490 million or US$495 million. Ssentongo declined to give the new trade targets before the forum ends.

Juba has not issued any written rule on foreign retail traders. It is unclear whether national authorities will set one, or whether the matter ends with the commissioner’s clarification.

Uganda’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs estimates exports at about US$700 million, up from about US$490 million in 2024. The Bank of Uganda is still finalising the figures.

The second forum runs from Tuesday 13 to Thursday 15 October 2026 at the Mestil Hotel in Kampala. New trade targets are due at the end.

No formal ban has been issued. A Juba County official urged foreigners to leave small retail trade to South Sudanese, then said a commissioner has no mandate to expel anyone.

It affects US investors in East African banks and telecoms, and aid programmes that ship food and fuel to South Sudan through Uganda.

Sources: Uganda Ministry of Foreign Affairs statements at the forum launch, Kampala, 7 October 2026, as reported by SoftPower News and ChimpReports ; Eye Radio , Juba, 8 October 2026.

Editorial responsibility: Matthias Camenzind , Editor-in-Chief · Editorial standards · Report an error

Africa: The New Scramble, the great-power contest over the continent.